The official materials are the only reliable indication, and a new programme's processing experience is not yet settled. Treat any confident timeline from another source with caution.
Speed claims deserve the most scepticism
Speed is the attribute most often attached to this framework in discussion and the one least supported by evidence, because a recently created programme has limited processing history and its administrative arrangements may still be developing. An applicant whose plan depends on a particular date should not build that plan on a projected timeline from any secondary source. Check what the official material actually commits to, distinguish between stated intentions and guarantees, and consider what happens to the transferred funds if the process takes considerably longer than expected. Where timing genuinely drives the decision, that is a reason to compare against categories with an established processing record rather than a reason to proceed faster.
Follow the current official instructions in order and avoid treating a family's preferred timeline as though it could shorten vetting or bypass any eligibility requirement. The actual result depends on required submissions, vetting, eligibility, admissibility, and visa availability, and general processing language on a government page is not an individual guarantee for any specific applicant.